Workshop Series Literature Holder for Tabletop or Wall, 6 Adjustable Pockets - Clear

Clear Pamphlet Rack
Number of Pockets: 3 / 6
10 2 / 4 4 / 8 6
  • 3-Tiered Design
  • 6 Pockets Fit 4 x 9 Trifold Brochures
  • Removable Pocket Dividers Accommodate 8.5 x 11 Magazines
$72.38 / Each (CAD)
Add To Cart Save to Wish List

Description

6 Pocket Pamphlet Rack with Adjustable Acrylic Design

Pamphlet Rack - A versatile, upscale unit that can be used as a countertop or wall mount piece to display your information. As a dual option holder this literature display has sturdy, removable peg dividers to configure the pockets for either 4" brochures (4 1/8" max width) or 8 1/2" wide magazines or packets (8 5/8" max width). Simply snap-in or snap-out the dividers to reconfigure the pockets. Overall dimensions: 9 1/4"wide by 4 3/4" deep with a 15 1/2" high back wall. Front wall is 7 1/2" high. Pockets are 1-1/2" deep. Compartments are tiered up 2" above compartment in front. Wall mounting hardware and extra pegs are supplied. Single sheets or papers will not stay upright in this magazine display rack

Specifications

SKU NGDO853
Overall Width x Height x Depth 9.3" x 53.8" x 4.8"
Pocket Depth 1.5"
Line or Series The Workshop
Material Acrylic
Color Clear
Placement Style Counter / Tabletop, Wall Mounted
Features Adjustable Pocket Dividers, Multi-Tiered
Pocket Type Multi-Pocket
Number of Pockets 3, 6

Ordering Information

Out Of Stock
We expect to have more in stock in approximately 12 days.

Reviews

Browse reviews from customers who have already purchased this product.

Overall 5 out of 5 | 2 reviews


5 / 5
Purchasing Manager
on Verified Purchase
the product is great. exactly what I expected. and to top it off, the product came all bubble wrapped and delivered without any complications. how nice!! thank you so much.

5 / 5
3- Tiered Acrylic Literature Holder for Tabletop or Wall
on Verified Purchase
We ordered and received 12 assemblies, and they came in 12 huge boxes with volumes of packing material. We paid 3 times for shipping costs than the holders themselves cost. It would have been much more cost effective and efficient to include a few holders in one box, shipping 3 or 4 boxes instead of 12 boxes. The holders themselves seem fine.

Questions & Answers